Cloud Equivalents

Migration & analytics integration · AWS vs Google Cloud

Amazon RDS and Aurora zero-ETL integrations vs Datastream

RDS and Aurora zero-ETL integrations map partly to Datastream replication into BigQuery, or to BigQuery federated queries against Cloud SQL.

AlloyDB's columnar engine handles analytics in place.

Partial match Use it to: Analyze operational database data in near real time without building or running ETL pipelines.

Last verified: · Edit on GitHub · Report an error

Side-by-side comparison

Zero-ETL replication into analytics: AWS vs Google Cloud side by side
AspectAmazon Web ServicesGoogle Cloud
ServiceAmazon RDS and Aurora zero-ETL integrationsDatastream
LifecycleGenerally availableGenerally available
What it isManaged, near-real-time replication of operational database data into Amazon Redshift or a SageMaker lakehouse, with no pipelines to build.Serverless change data capture and replication from operational databases into BigQuery, Cloud Storage, and other targets.
Pricing modelNo charge for the integration itself. You pay for change processing on the source and for Redshift compute and storage.Datastream is billed per GiB processed, plus BigQuery storage and queries.
DocsAmazon RDS and Aurora zero-ETL integrations docsDatastream docs
Pricing pageAmazon RDS and Aurora zero-ETL integrations pricingDatastream pricing

Key differences

  • Datastream is a CDC pipeline you configure, not a single checkbox integration.
  • Federated queries read live data without copying it.

Pricing summary

Pricing models only. No prices are quoted because they change by region and over time.

AWS
No charge for the integration itself. You pay for change processing on the source and for Redshift compute and storage. Amazon RDS and Aurora zero-ETL integrations pricing →
GCP
Datastream is billed per GiB processed, plus BigQuery storage and queries. Datastream pricing →

And on Azure?

Partial match Azure's equivalent is Mirroring in Microsoft Fabric. AWS vs Azure comparison →

FAQ

What is the Google Cloud equivalent of Amazon RDS and Aurora zero-ETL integrations?

RDS and Aurora zero-ETL integrations map partly to Datastream replication into BigQuery, or to BigQuery federated queries against Cloud SQL. AlloyDB's columnar engine handles analytics in place.

How does pricing compare between Amazon RDS and Aurora zero-ETL integrations and Datastream?

AWS: No charge for the integration itself. You pay for change processing on the source and for Redshift compute and storage. Google Cloud: Datastream is billed per GiB processed, plus BigQuery storage and queries. Check the official pricing pages for current rates.

What is the Azure equivalent?

Mirroring in Microsoft Fabric (partial match). Aurora and RDS zero-ETL integrations (to Amazon Redshift or a SageMaker lakehouse) map to Microsoft Fabric mirroring, which continuously replicates Azure SQL, Cosmos DB, PostgreSQL, and other sources into OneLake as Delta tables.

Related AWS vs GCP comparisons

Official sources