Cloud Equivalents

Events, queues & pub/sub · AWS vs Google Cloud

Amazon MQ: Google Cloud equivalent

Google Cloud has no managed ActiveMQ or RabbitMQ service like Amazon MQ.

Use Pub/Sub for new designs, or run brokers yourself on GKE or Compute Engine.

No equivalent Use it to: Move apps that speak JMS, AMQP 0-9-1, MQTT, or STOMP to the cloud without rewriting them for a proprietary queue API.

Last verified: · Edit on GitHub · Report an error

Side-by-side comparison

Managed open-source message brokers (ActiveMQ, RabbitMQ): AWS vs Google Cloud side by side
AspectAmazon Web ServicesGoogle Cloud
ServiceAmazon MQNo first-party equivalent
LifecycleGenerally available—
What it isManaged Apache ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ brokers for apps that use JMS, AMQP 0-9-1, MQTT, STOMP, or OpenWire without rewriting.—
Pricing modelPer broker instance-hour (single-instance or active/standby or cluster) plus storage.Not applicable.
DocsAmazon MQ docs—
Pricing pageAmazon MQ pricing—

Key differences

  • Migrating from JMS or AMQP clients to Pub/Sub requires code changes.

Pricing summary

Pricing models only. No prices are quoted because they change by region and over time.

AWS
Per broker instance-hour (single-instance or active/standby or cluster) plus storage. Amazon MQ pricing →
GCP
Not applicable.

And on Azure?

Partial match Azure's equivalent is Azure Service Bus. AWS vs Azure comparison →

FAQ

Does Google Cloud have an equivalent to Amazon MQ?

Google Cloud has no managed ActiveMQ or RabbitMQ service like Amazon MQ. Use Pub/Sub for new designs, or run brokers yourself on GKE or Compute Engine.

How does pricing compare between Amazon MQ and Google Cloud?

AWS: Per broker instance-hour (single-instance or active/standby or cluster) plus storage. Google Cloud: Not applicable. Check the official pricing pages for current rates.

What is the Azure equivalent?

Azure Service Bus (partial match). Azure has no managed ActiveMQ or RabbitMQ service like Amazon MQ.

Related AWS vs GCP comparisons

Official sources