Hybrid storage gateways · AWS vs Google Cloud
AWS Storage Gateway – Amazon FSx File Gateway: Google Cloud equivalent
Google Cloud has no hybrid storage gateway like AWS Storage Gateway (FSx File Gateway).
Use Storage Transfer Service agents to move data, or partner gateways.
Side-by-side comparison
| Aspect | Amazon Web Services | Google Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| Service | AWS Storage Gateway – Amazon FSx File Gateway Maintenance | No first-party equivalent |
| Lifecycle | No longer available to new customers since Oct 28, 2024. Existing customers can keep using it. | — |
| What it is | An on-premises cache for FSx for Windows File Server shares over SMB. | — |
| Pricing model | Existing customers pay gateway charges plus FSx charges. | Not applicable. |
| Docs | AWS Storage Gateway – Amazon FSx File Gateway docs | — |
| Pricing page | AWS Storage Gateway – Amazon FSx File Gateway pricing | — |
Key differences
- Storage Transfer Service moves data on a schedule or by events; it doesn't present a local cached share or volume.
Pricing summary
Pricing models only. No prices are quoted because they change by region and over time.
- AWS
- Existing customers pay gateway charges plus FSx charges. AWS Storage Gateway – Amazon FSx File Gateway pricing →
- GCP
- Not applicable.
And on Azure?
Partial match Azure's equivalent is Azure File Sync. AWS vs Azure comparison →
FAQ
Does Google Cloud have an equivalent to AWS Storage Gateway – Amazon FSx File Gateway?
Google Cloud has no hybrid storage gateway like AWS Storage Gateway (FSx File Gateway). Use Storage Transfer Service agents to move data, or partner gateways.
How does pricing compare between AWS Storage Gateway – Amazon FSx File Gateway and Google Cloud?
AWS: Existing customers pay gateway charges plus FSx charges. Google Cloud: Not applicable. Check the official pricing pages for current rates.
What is the Azure equivalent?
Azure File Sync (partial match). Amazon FSx File Gateway, closed to new customers since Oct 28, 2024, maps to Azure File Sync.